Navin Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4767 of 2022 ====================================================== Navin Kumar Gupta Son of Ramesh Kumar Gupta Resident of Sanhauliganj, P.S. Khagaria, District Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Land and Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Khagaria.

4.

The Superintendent of Police, Khagaria.

5.

The Dy. Superintendent of Police, Khagaria.

6.

The Sub- divisional Officer, Sadar, Khagaria. 7.

The Officer in - charge, Town Police Station, Khagaria. 8.

The Anchal Adhikari, Khagaria.

9.

Bulbul Choudhary Son of Umesh Choudhary Resident of Sanhauli, P.S. Chitragupt Nagar, District Khagaria.

10.

Rajeev Prasad Sinha Son of Krishnandan Prasad Resident of Sanhauli, P.S. Chitragupt Nagar, District Khagaria.

11.

Chandan Singh Son of Balbhadra Prasad Singh Resident of Sanhauli, P.S. Chitragupt Nagar, District Khagaria.

12.

Chandan Mandal Son of Bharat Mandal Resident of Sanhauli, P.S. Chitragupt Nagar, District Khagaria.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abdul Mannan, Advocate :

Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC 25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2022 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :- "(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to provide protection to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.4767 of 2022(2) dt.19-12-2022 2/2 petitioner in respect of his life and the land mentioned in this writ petition.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondents from interfering in the peaceful possession and occupation of the petitioner in respect of the land in question."

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies, as are available under the law. Liberty so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U