Kumari Garima Bharti v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9666 of 2016 ====================================================== Kumari Garima Bharti W/o Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, R/o VillageJagarnathpur, P.O. Kishunpur, Amarnoriya, P.S. Sajour, Shahkumd. At present residing at Mohalla Gandhi Nagar Colony, Laluchak, Angari, P.S. Esakchak, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, District- Patna. 2.

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, District- Patna. 3.

The Managing Director Bhagalpur Central Co-operative Bank Lt Bhagalpur, Jageshwar Mandal Bhawan, Red Cross Road, Adampur, District- Bhagalpur. 4.

The Registrar, Bihar State Co-operative, Bank Ltd. Ashok Raj Path, Patna04. 5.

The Chairman, Board of Directors, the Bhagalpur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., Bhagalpur, Jageshwar Mandal Bhawan, Red Cross Road, Adampur, District- Bhagalpur.

6.

The Managing Director, the Bahgalpur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Bhagalpur, Jageshwar Mandal Mandal Bhawan, Red Cross Road, Adampur, District- Bhagalpur.

7.

The District Co-operative Officer, District- Bhagalpur. 8.

The Branch Manager, Head Office, Bhagalpur, the Bhagalpur Central Cooperative, Bank Ltd. Distt- Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raghwanand, GA 11 For the Bank : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he has not taken any instruction from the petitioner and he

Patna High Court CWJC No.9666 of 2016(3) dt.07-12-2023 2/2 is not in a position to inform this Court whether the petitioner has left the service in the year 2017 or not.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank on the other hand inform this Court that the petitioner has left the service in the year 2017 itself.

4. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

5. Permission is accorded.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U