← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34399/2018disposed

Jyoti Prakash Pandey @ Raju Pandey v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2026-01-28Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34399 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Jyoti Prakash Pandey @ Raju Pandey son of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, resident of Village- Karhasi, Police Station- Buxar Muffasil in the District of Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sandhya Devi, wife of Jyoti Prakash Pandey @ Raju Pandey, daughter of Shiv Murat Ojha, resident of Village- Dobhara, Police Station- Bihian in the district of Bhojpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S.N.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. S.P. Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1, APP For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ishaan Raj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This petition has been filed for quashing of order dated 04.05.2018 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur, Ara by which the petitioner was directed to make payment of Rs.10,000/- per month as maintenance and Rs.20,000/- for the cost of litigation.

3. From the status report vide letter no.4142 dated 30.08.2025 sent by learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhojpur at Ara, it appears that the said case has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34399 of 2018(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 disposed of and the accused persons have been acquitted on 23.10.2019.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of as it has now become infructuous.

5. Learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 and learned APP for the State have no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.

6. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U T