Raj Kishore Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26941 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2020 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAJ KISHORE RAY S/o Late Deoraji Ray R/o village- Dharmuha, P.S.- Muffasil Motihari, District- East Champaran at Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binay Kumar, Advovcate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-10-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 141 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 28.03.2020.
The allegation against the petitioner is to commit murder of wife, by causing head injury, while making an assault with hammer.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26941 of 2021(3) dt.15-10-2022 2/3 submitted that informant is not the eye witness of the occurrence and implication is purely ill-motivated due to family disputes. It is submitted that present case was not lodged by the parents of the deceased rather by son of sister of the deceased, who is resident of different village. It is further submitted that head injury was received by the deceased due to accident. It is also submitted that petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2020 i.e. about more than two and a half (2 1⁄2) years, where only four (4) witnesses were examined and, as such, the trial is not likely to conclude in near future, where none of the examined witnesses supported the occurrence. It is also submitted that marriage of petitioner was solemnized with deceased/wife before 15 years. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as the present case is not lodged by parents of the deceased, where informant is not the eye witness of the occurrence coupled with the fact that trial is not likely to conclude in near future, where petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2020, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 141 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26941 of 2021(3) dt.15-10-2022 3/3 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran/concerned court, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) R.S.Sen/- U T