← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8214/2021disposed

M/S Manikant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-01The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar7 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8214 of 2021 ====================================================== ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar, A.C. to A.G.

For the Union of India :

Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG Mr. Anshuman Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) ===================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/ Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential ofÏces/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/ofÏces.) Date : 01-07-2021 Our attention is invited to the Circular dated 11th of August, 2020, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (State Taxes-I Section), and Circular dated 27th of October, 2020, issued by the

2/7 Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Central Board of Indirect taxes & Customs) Legal Cell, copy whereof is taken on record.

In view of the same, Union of India be impleaded as Party Respondent No. 4.

Registry to make necessary correction, both on the digital as also the hard file.

Dr. K.N. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General and Shri Anshuman Singh, Sr. S.C., CGST & CX enter appearance on behalf of the newly added respondents. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

3/7 Petitioner has filed the instant petition praying, inter alia to quash the impugned order 13th of February, 2021 (Annexure-5) passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Taxes (Appeal), Purnea Division, Purnea in Appeal Case No. (ARN) AD1002210022382 and the order in Form GST APL02 dated 13th of February, 2021 passed in GSTIN/Temp ID/UIN 10AAXFM2133R1ZV, preferred against the order dated 13th of February, 2020 by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Purnea Circle, Purnea, Respondent No. 3 in Reference No. ZA1002200179629, summary of order in form GST DRC-07, order dated 01.07.2020 passed in Reference No. ZD100720000074F and Summary of rectification/withdrawal order in Form GST DRC-8 dated 1st of July, 2020 passed by Respondent No. 3. The appeal filed by the petitioner has been

4/7 rejected merely on the ground of delay. Both the orders are ex parte in nature.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the entire amount in terms of the demand raised by the department stands recovered from the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the Revenue, states that he has no objection if the matter is remanded to the Assessing Authority for deciding the case afresh. Also the case shall be decided on merits and during pendency of the case, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties as also perused the record made available, we dispose of the present petition in the following mutually agreeable terms:- (a) We quash and set aside the impugned order 13th of February, 2021 (Annexure-5) passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Taxes (Appeal), Purnea Division, Purnea in Appeal Case No. (ARN) AD1002210022382, the order in Form GST APL-02 dated 13th of February, 2021 passed in GSTIN/Temp ID/UIN 10AAXFM2133R1ZV, the order dated 13th of February, 2020 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Purnea Circle, Purnea,

5/7 Respondent No. 3 in Reference No. ZA1002200179629, summary of order in form GST DRC-07, order dated 01.07.2020 passed in Reference No. ZD100720000074F and Summary of rectification/withdrawal order in Form GST DRC-8 dated 1st of July, 2020 passed by Respondent No. 3; (b) The case shall be decided on merits by passing a speaking order;

(c) If it is ultimately found that the amount recovered from the petitioner is in excess, the same shall be refunded within two months from the date of passing of the order;

(d) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of the bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in reference to the proceedings, subject matter of present petition. This shall be done immediately.

(e) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the Assessing Authority on 9th of August, 2021 at 10:30 A.M., if possible through digital mode;

(f) The Assessing Authority shall decide the case of the petitioner on merits after complying with the principles of natural justice;

(g) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the

6/7 parties to place on record all essential documents and materials, if so required and desired;

(h) During pendency of the case, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

(i) The Assessing Authority shall pass a fresh order only after affording adequate opportunity to all concerned, including the writ petitioner;

(j) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to fully cooperate in such proceedings and not take unnecessary adjournment;

(k) The Assessing Authority shall decide the case on merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner; (l) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order, if required and desired;

(m) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(n) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law, with a reasonable dispatch;

7/7 (o) We have not expressed any opinion on merits and all issues are left open;

(p) If possible, proceedings during the time of current Pandemic [Covid-19] be conducted through digital mode;

The instant petition sands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to communicate the order to the appropriate authority through electronic mode.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 07.07.2021 Transmission Date