Vikash Kumar @ Akash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17348 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-395 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Akash Kumar Son of Dhaneshar Yadav Resident of village - Nauranga, P.S.- Muffassil and District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Heard both parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Muffasil P.S. Case No. 395 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with coaccused persons killed the son of informant by means of sharp cutting weapon.

It is submitted that petitioner has been made accused in this case only on suspicion. Informant is not eye-witness of the occurrence. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Counsel for State however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR with the allegation that he along with co-accused persons killed the son of informant by sharp cutting weapon. The doctor has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17348 of 2022(2) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 found the injuries caused by sharp cutting weapons and the deceased has sustained multiple injuries.

Considering the facts aforesaid and gravity of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T