Chandra Kala Rani v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5180 of 2019 ====================================================== Chandra kala Rani Wife of Lakshmi Narayan Razak, Resident of ward no.6, Jay Prakash Nagar, P.S.-Madhepura District-Madhepura, Posted at Adhik lal M.S Madhepura District-Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saharsa 6.
The District Education Officer, Madhepura.
7.
The District Program Officer (Establishment), Madhepura ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arabind Nath Pandey, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar, AC to GP 23.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-05-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the State.
The present writ petition has been filed for issuing a direction to the respondents to grant senior pay scale on completion of 12 years.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is no more res integra. A coordinate Bench of this Court had already decided the issue vide order dated 31.03.2011 passed in CWJC No. 6139
Patna High Court CWJC No.5180 of 2019(3) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 of 2007 (Ram Ashis Tiwary & others vs. The State of Bihar and others) and the order of the Writ Court was affirmed in L.P.A. No. 756 of 2015 dated 16.08.2017.
In above view of the matter, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.6 to examine the case of the petitioners in light of the decision of the Writ Court in C.W. J.C. No. 6139 of 2007 dated 31.03.2011 as affirmed in L.P.A. No. 756 of 2015 dated 16.08.2017 and the final decision in this regard must be taken by the respondent no.6 within a period of two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order and all consequential benefits including the monetary benefit should be extended to the petitioners within a period of one month thereafter. The writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/- U