Santosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26079 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2017 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== Santosh Yadav, aged about 31 years, Male, S/O Sri Yogi Yadav @ Yogo Yadav, R/O Village- Diyara Bishunpur, P.S.- Dhamdaha, Distt.- Purnia. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N. K. Argawal, Sr. Advocate M/s. Amresh Kumar Sinha Preety Kunwar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147 /148/ 149/ 323/ 341/387/307/302/504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section27 of the Arms Act and added Sections of 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1, giving a liberty to renew his prayer after completing one year in custody.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 08.01.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26079 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 157/17, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T