Guddu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16973 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2019 Thana- CHANAN District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Guddu Kumar Yadav Son of Sri Deeplal Yadav Resident of Village - Mananpur Basti, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-06-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

Heard the parties.

The petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27 of the Arms Act. Later on offence under Sections 17/18/20/23 of the U.A.P. Act was added. The FIR would reveal that co-accused Rana Singh is assailant of the brother of the informant by causing fire-arm injury. Some unknown persons were also there along with Rana Singh. However, no overt-act is alleged against the unknown persons. During investigation name of the petitioner surfaced The petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16973 of 2020(2) dt.02-06-2020 2/2 Considering the fact that there is no direct material against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 119 of 2019 with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

If the petitioner would not be able in furnishing sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T