← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19200/2024bail granted

Vijay Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-21Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19200 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-846 Year-2023 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vijay Rai S/O- Lalit Rai @ Ram Lalit Rai @ Ramalalit Ray R/O- VillageAkilabad, Ward No.- 08, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, Dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of five cases and the allegation is of recovery of 260 litres of liquor from a place near the cremation ground.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioner and which is accessible to public at large and he came to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19200 of 2024(2) dt.21-03-2024 2/2 implicated at the instance of Chaukidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is next submitted that in most of the cases, innocent persons are being implicated by the police either at the instance of Chaukidar or local people. It is thus submitted that if the Chaukidar was aware that the petitioner had concealed the liquor in the cremation ground, why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the F.I.R.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1cum- Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur P. S. Case No.846 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T