Randhir Kumar Keshri @ Dablu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3695 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -667 Year- 2014 Thana -GAYA KOTWALI District- GAYA ====================================================== Randhir Kumar Keshri @ Dablu son of Late Damodar Keshari Resident of Mohallah- Murarpur, Kali Asthan, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-05-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gaya (Kotwali) P.S.Case No.667 of 2014 instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 427, 379, 511, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The allegation is that when the informant (Member of Legislative Assembly) sent his driver to the shop of the petitioner for purchasing the Tilkut and Anarsa then on some point altercation followed by scuffle started in which when the informant and his men went there to pacify them then this petitioner allegedly threw hot melted sugar lumps on him and his other men with the help of his other persons causing him injuries as well as also injuries to the members of the informant side.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3695 of 2015 (3) dt.21-05-2015 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner the present case is outcome of the counter case, Annexure 2 to the present application. Further it has been submitted that prior to institution of the present case, the case of the accused was instituted .Further it has been submitted that the injury report on the part of the accused has not been explained by the prosecution which indicates that the prosecution has not come with clean hand. The injury sustained on the part of the accused is Annexure 3 in the present application.

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR.

Considering the fact that the injury on the part of the accused has not been explained , let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of eight weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gaya in Gaya ( Kotwali) P.S.Case No. 667 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down u/s 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Sudhir Singh, J) singh/- U T