Subodh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19027 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2020 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Subodh Singh Son of Jaiprakash Singh Resident of village-Nishad Tola (Poura), P.S.-Gogari (Poura), District-Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 29-03-2023 Heard the parties.
The present application has been filed for grant of bail in connection with ST No. 400/2022 arising out of Gogari (Poura) P.S. Case No. 238/2020 for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C.
As per the allegation, the informant's mother was having dispute with one Jai Prakash Singh. It is alleged that accused Meena Devi, Subodh Singh (petitioner herein), Bhagwati Devi, Jai Prakash Singh and Ankit Kumar came variously armed and firstly, they tried to assault the informant's mother but the informant came in between and was injured. Further allegation is that when his younger brother Pintu Kumar came at the place of occurrence, accused Subodh Singh (petitioner herein) gave a 'lathi' blow on his head which proved fatal. The post-mortem report of the deceased clearly show that the cause of death was due to brain haemorrhage and shock due to hard and blunt object.
Earlier the matter was taken up on 16.05.2022 and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19027 of 2023(2) dt.29-03-2023 2/2 same was rejected vide Cr. Misc. No. 67076 of 2021. Considering the allegation that has come against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to take a second look and as such the bail application accordingly stands rejected. However, taking into account the period of custody and further submission that the charge has already been framed, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the Trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/-Kiran U T