Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44237/2017bail granted

Ram Ekbal Patel v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-11-01Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44237 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHEBGANJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Ram Ekbal Patel, Son of Bhola Nath Patel, Resident of VillageHussepur, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ashutosh Kumar, District Manager, B.S.F.C., Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Thakur Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the BSFC : Mr. Niraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2017 in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406/409/420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.

Considering the entire gamut of circumstances and the fact that the petitioner has already been in custody in connection with the present case since 19.05.2017, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 58 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44237 of 2017 (3) dt.01-11-2017 2/2

(1) One of the bailors will be his own relative, namely, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T