Indrajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6631 of 2019 ====================================================== Indrajeet Kumar S/o Kamleshwari Yadav R/o Ward No. 8, Hathi Das Tola, Gandhi Path, P.S. Saharsa, Dist-Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna 2.
The Principal Secretary Department of Home, Bihar, Patna 3.
The Chairman Central Selection Commission (Constable Recruitment), Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG-3 For the B.P.S.C.
:
Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 24-04-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondent/Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar for appointing the petitioner on the post of Constable Driver.
3. It appears that after having cleared all hurdles in the examination, no appointment letter was issued to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6631 of 2019 dt.24-04-2019 2/3
4. Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned advocate for the Board has informed this Court that at the time of verification of the documents furnished by aspirants/applicants, including the petitioner, it was found that the handwriting/fingerprints and signature of some of the candidates did not match with their original handwriting/fingerprints in the form as well as in the attendance sheet at the time of mains examination. It was therefore doubted whether such persons had appeared in the examination or had managed to have others write the examination for them. For the aforesaid purpose a case was lodged vide Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 73 of 2019 in which the petitioner also has been arraigned as one of the accused persons and which FIR is still pending investigation.
5. In the aforesaid background facts, no direction can be issued to the respondent Board for issuing any appointment letter to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6631 of 2019 dt.24-04-2019 3/3
6. It would be open for the petitioner to agitate his claim if in investigation, he is exonerated.
7. With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition is dismissed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 26.04.2019 Transmission Date