← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17226/2019bail granted

Uma Shankar Sharma @ Uma Sharma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2019-03-29Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17226 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Uma Shankar Sharma @ Uma Sharma, Son of Late Bhuwaneshwar Sharma 2.

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Singh, Son of Uma Shankar Sharma @ Uma Sharma Both are Resident of Mohalla-Shri Krishnapuri Colony, P.S.- Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 29-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP representing the State.

Petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law and petitioner no.2 is the Bhaisur of the informant who are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 64 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 504, 506 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner no.1 being 73 years old person is residing in the same house in which his two other sons are residing with their respective family separately. It is submitted that there had been some altercation between two ladies of the family which has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17226 of 2019(2) dt.29-03-2019 2/2 given rise to the present case in which a false allegation has been made by the informant against these petitioners that they tried to outrage her modesty. It is submitted that the only one injury noticed on the body of the informant is simple in nature. This petitioners have also no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the age and relationship of the petitioners and nature of the injury which is said to be simple as also that there is no criminal antecedent, in case of arrest or surrender of the petitioners within a period of four weeks from today, the abovenamed petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.15,000/- (rupees fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfication of the learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 64 of 2016, subject to the condition prescribed under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T