← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15843/2019bail rejected

Guddu @ Ashique @ Ashik @ Md. Guddu v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2019-03-28Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15843 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1334 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== Guddu @ Ashique @ Ashik @ Md. Guddu, age about 34 years (Male), Son of Md. Shamim @ Md. Shamim Razak Resident of Mohalla-Murarpur Mani Road Kalisthan, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mazhabi Khatoon Wife of Md. Shabir Resident of Mohalla-Murarpur Mani Road Kalisthan, P.S.-Kotwali, District-Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1334 of 2018 (Tr. No. 394 of 2018) registered for offences under sections 354 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation made in the complaint petition, the petitioner is the cousin father-in-law of the Complainant who attempted to commit rape upon her.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the witnesses are the chance witnesses. He further submits that a false case has been lodged against the petitioner on account of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15843 of 2019(3) dt.28-03-2019 2/2 family dispute in between the husband of the Complainant and the present petitioner.

When the court has taken cognizance, the petitioner was required to appear before the court below and pray for regular bail.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, above named, is rejected.

If the petitioner surrenders before the court below within a period of three weeks from today and prays for bail, the court below, taking into consideration all aspects of the matter, will take a decision in accordance with law.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T