← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13154/2014dismissed

Surendra B.Ed. Teachers Training College v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-11-06Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13154 of 2014 =========================================================== Surendra B.Ed. Teachers Training College, Surendra Nagar, Shivala More, Neora, Khagaul, Patna, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna Running under Surendra Hemant Education & Social Welfare Society, through its Secretary, Dr. Shashi Bhushan Singh.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Registration Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Industries Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Bihar, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Patna.

6. The Registrar, Registry Office, Danapur, Patna. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Partha Sarthy, GA11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-11-2015 Petitioner filed writ application for a direction upon the respondents not to demand and claim stamp duty for registration of land since the petitioner is setting up a B.Ed. College which is a no profit no loss organization.

One of the reasons for making such claim is a gazette notification dated 24th of October, 2011 annexed as Annexure-4. This notification has been issued as part of the industrial policy to encourage industrialization and expansion of industries in the State of Bihar and it is for the industries that such exemptions from registration and stamp duty has been exempted for certain period of time. Since petitioner's B.Ed. college does not come within the

Patna High Court CWJC No.13154 of 2014 dt.06-11-2015 2 / 2 ambit and scope of the notification so issued in Annexure-4, the prayer of the petitioner for such an exemption has been moved on a mistaken understanding of law or the same said gazette notification. Writ has not merit. It is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) Sanjay/- U