Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46247/2017bail granted

Upendra Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46247 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2017 Thana -RAJGIR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Upendra Rajbanshi, son of Vanas Rajbanshi, resident of village Badahari, P.S. Chhabilapur, Distt. Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S. Ehteshamuddin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 129 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner and five other accused persons of recovery of stolen motorcycle. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has no concern with the seizure of concerned stolen motorcycle. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 8.6.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46247 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017 2/2 Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda, in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 129 of 2017, subject to the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U T