Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46783/2017bail granted

Md. Saharyar Abdin @ Saharyar Abdin v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-09-21Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46783 of 2017 Arising Out of Case No. -2116 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== Md. Saharyar Abdin @ Saharyar Abdin, son of Md. Ainul Abdin @ Ainul Abdin, resident of village- Puraini, Police Station- Jagdishpur, DistrictBhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State of Bihar

2. Rajiv Kumar @ Ritesh Ranjan, son of Ram Lakhan Podar, Resident of village- Baluachak, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-09-2017 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 2116 of 2015 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian penal Code. Allegation in brief is that accused persons formed a company in the name of Wealth Agro Industries Limited and on the assurance of giving sufficient interest and to provide employment, the complainant got deposited money of other persons in the company but later on disappeared. Submission is that it is a complaint case and the petitioner is shown as a Chairman of the company but in fact he was an employee and other co-accused has been granted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46783 of 2017 (2) dt.21-09-2017 2/2 anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41675 of 2017. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Md. Saharyar Abdin @ Saharyar Abdin, is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IX, Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 2116 of 2015 with condition that one of the bailor must be a Government employee and he shall be present before the trial court on each and every date and if he fails on two consecutive dates without any reasonable ground, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled. (Arun Kumar, J) Sujit/- U T