Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43212/2017bail granted

Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-22Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43212 of 2017 (3) dt.22-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43212 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -208 Year- 2017 Thana -PATLIPUTRA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Munna Kumar son of Late Umesh Singh, Resident of Village- Ram Dayalu Nagar, Police Station- Turki, District- Muzaffarpur, At present residing at Indrapuri, Road No. 1, Police Station- Patliputra, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lovekush Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 208 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of NDPS Act. Allegation is of recovery of 100 grams of ganja. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 29.06.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43212 of 2017 (3) dt.22-09-2017 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge, NDPS Act, Patna, in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 208 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T