Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17191 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2022 Thana- KADWA District- Katihar ====================================================== MD. INTEJAR Son of Kamarul Hoda Resident of Village - Bholadangi, P.s.- Kadwa, Distt.- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Musowir For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 342, 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing rape on the daughter of informant aged about 15 years. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17191 of 2022(2) dt.25-07-2022 2/2 this case. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and have submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of committing rape on the victim girl which gets support from the medical evidence.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of this petitioner is rejected.
The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of nine months. (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) sanjeev/- U T