Rabindra Gupta v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12936 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -795 Year- 2013 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Rabindra Gupta Son of Ramadhar Sah Resident of Village - Raghunathpur, P.S. - Natwar, District - Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Hewanti Devi Wife of Rabindra Gupta, Daughter of Bandhu Sah Resident of Village - Karhansi, P.S. - Natwar, District - Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Rab(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-05-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 795 of 2013 instituted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the complainant got her marriage with the petitioner about 9 years ago and accused persons demanded Rs. 50,000/- and gold chain as dowry and when the demand was not fulfilled the complainant was ousted from her matrimonial house. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant along with him with dignity and honour, but same is not acceptable to the complainant. It is also submitted that the petitioner has filed a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12936 of 2015 (2) dt.21-05-2015 matrimonial case prior to the institution of the present case. It has further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 2,000/- per month in the learned court below and the same may be released in favour of the complainant.

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant and named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid fact that the petitioner is ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 2,000/- per month in the learned court below and the same shall be released in favour of the complainant, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of eight weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class-cum-Additional M-5, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Complaint Case No. 795 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Sudhir Singh, J) P.K./- U T