Baua @ Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15655 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2018 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Baua @ Krishna Kumar (Male), aged about 25 years, Son of Sunil Singh, Resident of Village -Mustafapur, P.S. Nalanda, District - Nalanda (Rajgir) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gouranga Chatterjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 289 of 2018 registered under Sections 365/34/302 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused. It is further submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Chandan Kumar. The other co-accused has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15655 of 2019(3) dt.26-06-2019 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 289 of 2018, subject to the following conditions :

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T