Prince Kumar @ Prince Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37114 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2016 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger ====================================================== Prince Kumar @ Prince Singh S/o Late Lalan Singh, R/o Vill.- Bindhwara, P.S.- Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 153 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, the petitioner and other FIR named accused persons being armed chased Suraj Sah @ Jhatakawa, the son of the informant, and shot him at the first floor of Bijay Talkies causing his death .

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 22.11.2016. There is no specific allegation against him, other co-accused have been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37114 of 2018(2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 allowed bail by different Benches of this Court and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that other similarly situated co-accused have been allowed bail, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Munger in Sessions Trial No. 244 of 2017 arising out of Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 153 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T