Ram Bharosh Ram @ Rambharosh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17219 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2025 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ram Bharosh Ram @ Rambharosh Ram S/o- Late Hariham Ram @ Harihar Ram Resident of Village- Neyam, P.S.- Hayaghat, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

XXX S/o- YYY R/v- Koylakund Ps- Kalyanpur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S. and Sections 8 and 12 of POCSO Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that during course of investigation, the victim has given her statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. wherein she has stated that while she was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17219 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 going to School, on 24.11.2025, the petitioner met her in the way and asked her to drop at her house. She has further stated that she was forcefully boarded on the bike and was taken to a place and she lived there for fifteen days. There was no physical relationship between them. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the victim has been with petitioner for fifteen days and she has not raised any alarm and that there is no allegation of assault or any sexual assault. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 12.12.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Court (POCSO), Samastipur in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T