Patna High CourtCWJC/13901/2014allowed

Jai Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-22Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13901 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Jai Ram Singh Son of Ram Pati, an Assistant teachers of Sardar Mangal Singh Project Girls High School, Mainatar, Post and P.S. Mainatar, DistrictWest Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

2. The Director (Secondary Education) Human Resources Development Department, Bihar Secondary Education Office, Budh Marg, Patna

3. The Regional Deputy Director of Education,Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

4. The District Education Officer, West Champaran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey & Miss Arpana Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gp26-Nirbhay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 22-01-2015 Keeping in mind the various orders, which have been passed from time to time by several Benches of this Court, some of which have been annexed as Annexure-7 and Annexure-7/A., the reason for rejection of the claim of the petitioner for regularization in the Project School becomes vulnerable. The only reason given by the Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar is that the petitioner was overage on the date of his appointment. Such matters have already been adjudicated in quite a detail after taking into consideration the several orders and

Patna High Court CWJC No.13901 of 2014 (2) dt.22-01-2015 2 / 2 judgments including the Full Bench decision, reported in 2000(1)P.LJ.R 287.

Annexure-1 in so far as it relates to the present petitioner is quashed. The writ application is allowed.

The Director is directed to pass a fresh order in favour of the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) B.Roy/- U