Rabi Kumar Raman @ Ravi Kumar Raman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33089 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Madhepura ====================================================== Rabi Kumar Raman @ Ravi Kumar Raman, aged about 25 years (Male), Son of Laxmi Yadav, Resident of Village - Patharaha, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Ghailadh, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 198 of 2018 (Excise Case No.1715 of 2018) registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner, but in paragraph-3 of the bail petition, the petitioner has been made accused in two cases bearing Madhepura (Parmanandpur P.S. Case No. 95 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 427, 447, 435, 307, 379, 354(A), 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33089 of 2019(3) dt.23-08-2019 2/2 Madhepura (Ghailarh) P.S. Case No. 535 of 2018 for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. However, the court below is directed to consider and dispose of the case on the same date.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T