Sunil Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19153 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2023 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Sunil Mandal S/O- Late Muneshwar Mandal R/O- Village- Parihari Ward No.- 08, P.S.- Raniganj, Dist.- Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar, PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Raniganj P.S. Case No. 313 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have pushed the informant's child in hot Mar (hot rice water) as a result of which the informant's child sustained burnt injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioner is Bhaisur of the informant and he has nothing to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19153 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2 do with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the informant's child has sustained burnt injury and the injury was found grievous in nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the fact that the injury was found grievous in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T