Ram Pramod Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26996 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2020 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

RAM PRAMOD SAHANI Son of Upendra Sahani Resident of VillageGaurigama, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi. 2.

Ram Pravesh Sahani Son of Upendra Sahani Resident of VillageGaurigama, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi. 3.

Upendra Sahani Son of Bisheshar Sahani Resident of Village- Gaurigama, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narayan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have committed the murder of the daughter of the complainant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no eye witness

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26996 of 2021(2) dt.16-12-2021 2/2 to the said occurrence and only on suspicion, petitioners have been made accused. He submits that though FIR was lodged under Section 302 of the IPC but after investigation, police has submitted the charge-sheet under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no eye witness to the said occurrence, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T