Arvind Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3153 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1099 Year- 2013 Thana -NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictNALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Arvind Kumar Yadav Son of Ranjit Gop Resident of Mohalla-Jai Hind Gali, P.S-Alamganj, Distt.-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Suchitra Devi Wife of Arvind Kumar Yadav Resident of Mohalla-Jai Hind Gali, P.S - Alamganj, Distt. - Patna, D/O Late Ramchandra Prasad, Resident of Mohalla - Shaluganj, Bihar Sharif, P.S-Bihar, Distt.-Nalanda. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Opposite Party/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. None appears for opposite party no.2 in spite of service of notice and filing of vakalatnama.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He is the husband of the complainant. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready and willing to continue the matrimonial relationship with the complainant and for that purpose he shall file an affidavit in the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of this

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3153 of 2015 (5) dt.22-05-2015 2/2 order in the court below.

No sooner the aforesaid affidavit is filed in the court below, petitioner above named be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rs. Five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Nalanda at Bihar Sharif in connection with Complaint Case No. 1099 ( C) of 2013 whereafter complainant should be noticed and once she appears, petitioner in presence of the court should persuade her to come back to the matrimonial home. In the event complainant comes back to the matrimonial home or the matrimonial dispute is resolved or the complainant is found to be unreasonable, provisional bail allowed to the petitioner should be confirmed, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders considering the reasonableness of the stand of the parties.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of. Let this order be communicated to the court below through fax on payment of usual charges by the petitioner. (V.N. Sinha, J.) Arjun/- U T