Saroj Chaudhary @ Saroj Kumar @ Saroj Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22534 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2023 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

SAROJ CHAUDHARY @ SAROJ KUMAR @ SAROJ KUMAR CHAUDHARY SON OF RADHESHYAM CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DUMRI, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA 2.

MANOJ CHAUDHARY @ MANOJ KUMAR CHOUDHARY SON OF RADHESHYAM CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DUMRI, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA 3.

RADHESHYAM CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE BRAHAMDEV CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DUMRI, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA 4.

SEETA RAM CHAUDHARY SON OF LATE BRAHAMDEV CHAUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DUMRI, P.S. - BIRAUL, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sameer Ranjan, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the IPC.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant and his family members.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22534 of 2024(3) dt.18-09-2024 2/2 petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. It is submitted that for the alleged occurrence, there is case and counter-case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries, which were found simple in nature. Petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4 have 2 criminal antecedents each and petitioner no.2 has one criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since injury was found simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No.283 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T