Manish Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16593 of 2026 Arising out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- MOHIUDDIN NAGAR DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Manish Ray, S/o- Rajdev Roy @ Raj Dev Ray, R/v- Ramiya PS- Mohiuddin Nagar Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mirtyunjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in Mohiuddin Nagar P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), 303(2), 352, 351920, 351(30 and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nagrik Sanhita, 2023.
3. The allegation is against seventeen named persons of surrounding and assaulting the informant. Further allegation is that Manish Kumar abused and assaulted the informant due to which his teeth were broken.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the FIR there were two Manish Kumar and from the allegation part it is not clear as to who was the person who assaulted the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16593 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/3 informant because the parentage has not been specified. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025 and he has twelve criminal antecedents and in all the cases he is on bail and this case is the result of animosity with his agnates. It is also submitted that both the parties have lodged cases against each other in past.
5. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering that the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025, he is author of injury on teeth and there is previous dispute between the parties, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Shahpur, Patori in connection with Mohiuddin Nagar P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16593 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 3/3 Sanhita.
8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.
(Ansul, J) Vikash/- U T