Krishna Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47451 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -314 Year- 2016 Thana -KUDRA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Krishna Pandey Son of Sri Antu Pandey resident of village - Mahavir Asthan (Kudra), Police Station - Kudra, District - Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajnandan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 Heard the parties.
Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected, vide order dated 17.2.2017 passed in Cr. Msc.No.6924 of 2017 with an observation that he may renew his prayer for bail after six months.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that now the period of six months has expired and he is in custody for ten months and in this case up-till-now no progress has been made in the trial and there is no likelihood of conclusion of the trial in near future.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47451 of 2017 (2) dt.11-10-2017 /2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Kudra P.S.Case No.314 of 2016. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T