Ramdeo Hembram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19776 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2021 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Ramdeo Hembram Son of Mangal Hembram Resident of village-Parwaha, Ward no. 07, P.S.- Forbesganj, District-Araria. 2.

Mangal Soren @ Mandal Soren @ Mangal Sauren Son of Jageshwar Soren Resident of village-Parwaha, Ward no. 07, P.S.- Forbesganj, District-Araria. 3.

Meena Devi Wife of Ramdeo Hembrm Resident of village-Parwaha, Ward no. 07, P.S.- Forbesganj, District-Araria.

4.

Srilal Hembram @ Sri Lal Hasuada S/O Chhotelal Hembram @ Chhotelal Hansda Resident of village-Parwaha, Ward no. 07, P.S.- Forbesganj, DistrictAraria 5.

Rup Lal Soren Son of Happan Soren Resident of village-Parwaha, Ward no. 07, P.S.- Forbesganj, District-Araria 6.

Bablu Murmur @ Babu Lal Murmu Son of Late Narsingh Murmu Resident of village-Parwaha, Ward no. 07, P.S.- Forbesganj, District-Araria 7.

Munni Devi Ramdeo Hembram Resident of village-Parwaha, Ward no. 07, P.S.- Forbesganj, District-Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhav Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 447, 327, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that assertion of right, title and possession over the disputed land

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19776 of 2025(2) dt.19-04-2025 2/2 by both parties led to simple Maarpeet. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Rest of the allegation is only ornamental in order to make the case grave. There is no injury report on record to substantiate the allegation of assault. Except petitioner no. 2, all the remaining six petitioners have got clean antecedent.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 279 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 38(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T