Ravi Nonia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59146 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2017 Thana -BHAGWANPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Ravi Nonia, S/o Late Harihar Nonia, Resident of Village- Mahuari, P.S.- Sonehan (Bhabua), District- Kaimur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Smt Renu Kumari (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which has already been rejected by order dated 05.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24160 of 2017, on the ground that liberty was given to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after remaining nine months in custody and the petitioner is in custody since 07.02.2017 and has remained in custody for more than nine months. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail by submitting

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59146 of 2017 (3) dt.20-12-2017 2/2 that the petitioner has assaulted, the injured repeatedly with farsa on his neck, he has also confessed his guilt and now threats are being caused from Jail by the petitioner to the informant and other witnesses.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with S.Tr. 278 of 2017/309 of 2017 arising out of Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2017, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T