← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5078/2022dismissed

Renu Kumari, v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5078 of 2022 ====================================================== Renu Kumari, Wife of Shri Rakesh Thakur @ Rakesh Kumar Thakur, resident of Village-Fatehpur, Malahari, P.S. Imamganj, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Deputy Director, Welfare Department, Magadh Division, Gaya. 3.

The Assistant Director, I.C.D.S. Directorate, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate Gaya.

5.

The District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S.), Gaya. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Imamganj, District-Gaya. 7.

The Lady Supervisor, office of Child Development Project Officer, Imamganj, District-Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md.Raisul Haque (SC-10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-11-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus, directing and commanding the respondents specially the District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S.). Gaya and Child Development Project Officer, Imamganj, Gaya (Respondent No. 5 & 6) to issue selection letter in

Patna High Court CWJC No.5078 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2023 2/2 favour of the petitioner who happens to be found most suitable candidate for the post of Anganwari Sevika in Centre Code -200, in Malhari Panchayat, Ward No. 02.

with Block Imamganj, District- Gaya, and her selection letter has been withheld by the respondent on erroneous ground."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U