← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13774/2014disposed

Pushpa Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-25Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13774 of 2014 ====================================================== Pushpa Kumari, Wife of Sri Awadhesh Singh, Resident of VillageKuchaikote, P.S.- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Regional Deputy Director, Saran at Chapra.

5. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

6. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj. null null

7. The Head Master, Manan Nagina Project Girls High School, Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj. null null

8. null null null ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava Ms. Rajni Gandha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. K.Alok, SC 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 25-09-2018 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case is covered by the decision in CWJC No. 13760 of 2014 disposed of on 19.09.2018.

If the case of the petitioner is covered by the order passed in CWJC No. 13760 of 2014 the respondents are required to consider and grant the same benefit to the petitioner as the petitioner in the said writ petition. Final decision may be taken by the respondents on the claim of the petitioner in the light of the decision passed in CWJC No. 13760 of 2014 within

Patna High Court CWJC No.13774 of 2014(2) dt.25-09-2018 2/2 a period of four months from today.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the present case. The respondent authorities are required to verify the record of the case and if it is found that the present case and the relief prayed for are similar to that of CWJC No. 13760 of 2014, the benefit will be extended to the petitioner within the stipulated period. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl./- U