Brij Bhushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 13583 of 2014 ====================================================== Brij Bhushan Kumar, Son of Shri Ram Pyare Rai, Resident of Sahaniapatti, P.O.- Bakhari, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Regional Deputy director of Education, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The District Education officer, Sitamarhi.

5.

The Sub- Divisional Education Officer, Sitamarhi 6.

The Block Education Officer, Parihar, Sitamarhi. 7.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

8.

The District Establishment Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s Sunil Kr Singh, Ran Vijay Singh, Advocates For the Respondent/s :

Mr Ramadhar Singh, GP XXV ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

Writ petition has been filed with a prayer that the respondents be directed to allow the petitioner to discharge his duties as Peon in the office of Block Education Officer, Parihar in the district of Sitamarhi and to treat his services as continuous from May, 2004. The claim has been raised by the petitioner before the Regional Deputy Director of Education (for brevity, RDDE), Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur on 31.12.2013. Copy of

Patna High Court CWJC No.13583 of 2014(2) dt.16-07-2019 2/2 the representation is Annexure 27 to the writ petition. Since the issue, as per claim submitted by the petitioner is to be considered by the authorities, pendency of the instant writ proceedings would be futile.

Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the RDDE (respondent No 3) that if no final decision has been communicated to the petitioner till date, the same be done by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U