Sunil Mahto @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52266 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2017 Thana -BHAIRABASHTHAN District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Sunil Mahto @ Sunil Kumar Son of Damodar Mahto, Resident of VillageSarisabpahi, P.S.-Pandaul, District-Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bhairav Asthan P.S. Case No. 69 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 412, 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 28 of the Arms Act.

The informant is a Sub-Inspector of police and he had stated that he received a secret information that some persons have assembled near Bideshwar Ashtan Chowk in order to commit some crime and they were apprehended by the police and there is recovery of one mobile from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52266 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no recovery from his conscious possession and he is in custody since 25.07.2017.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.- Ist, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, in connection with Bhairav Asthan P.S. Case No. 69 of 2017. (S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T