Nitish Kumar @ Golu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 441 of 2015 ====================================================== Nitish Kumar @ Golu, Minor son of Sunil Sharma, through the father of natural Guardian Sunil Sharma, resident of Village- Motha, Police StationArwal in the district of Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sahin Begum(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 23-09-2015 The petitioner was granted bail by order dated 23.04.2015 in Cr. Rev. No. 115 of 2015 with five conditions including condition no. (ii) that the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released.

It has been submitted that due to inadvertence the fact that petitioner was accused in one other case could not be mentioned in paragraph 3 and the same be condoned.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Jehanabad in connection with G.R. Case No. 1896 of 2014, Tr. No. 611(J) of 2014 arising out of Karpi (Sahar Telpa) P.S. Case No. 163 of 2014 subject to the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.441 of 2015 (2) dt.23-09-2015 2/2 conditions That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.

That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

The petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 250/- in the District Legal Aid Committee before his releasing. (Anjana Prakash, J) Prakash/- U T