Kallu Singh @ Yuraj Singh @ Yuvraj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21024 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2023 Thana- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL District- Buxar ====================================================== Kallu Singh @ Yuraj Singh @ Yuvraj Singh S/o Late Nagendra Singh @ Narendra Singh R/o Village- Mabhariya, P.S.-Buxar (Industrial), DistrictBuxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore (APP-100) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 375/2023 arising out of Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 201 of 2023, lodged on 27.07.2023 under Sections 341, 323, 307, 385, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, FIR has been lodged against the sole petitioner. The allegation against the present petitioner is that in the state of intoxication, he threatened to kill the informant if the informant wouldn't give him ransom amount of Rs.3,00,000/- and also of causing injury to the

2/4 informant by butt of pistol. Further allegation against the present petitioner is that he has snatched a golden chain & Rs.5,000/- from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel also submits that the entire allegation made in the fardbayan is a bundle of lie. Counsel further submits that injury report has been annexed as Annexure-2 by which it transpires that all injuries are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substances. Counsel submits that neither any fire arm injury nor any sharp cutting injury is there.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and there are ten criminal cases pending against him in which in all the cases, he is on bail. The petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2023 in the present case.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and this aspect may be taken into consideration while considering the bail application of the petitioner.

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case

3/4 and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named be granted bail, but only after framing of charge, if not framed and if the charge has been framed, then the petitioner shall be released after general elections of Lok Sabha 2024 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 4th, Buxar in connection with Sessions Trial No. 375/2023 arising out of Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 201 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 437(3) Cr.P.C.

8. However, the petitioner shall be granted bail only on being satisfied by the Trial Court that the petitioner is not absconding in any of the cases pending against him whose details are as follows:- Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017. Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 105 of 2016. Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 25 of 2020. Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 234 of 2021. Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 148 of 2018. Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 161 of 2018. Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 199 of 2018. Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 141 of 2018.

4/4 Buxar (Industrial) P.S. Case No. 08 of 2019. SC/ST P.S. Case No. 81 of 2017.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Divyansh/- U T