Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38402 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2018 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and leaned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 85 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 186, 504, 337, 427 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner as per F.I.R. is that the petitioner along with hundred other students involved in "dharna" during election of students union and brick betting due to which vehicle of the police was damaged.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no specific allegation has been attributed against him though he has named in the FIR along with three others.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38402 of 2018 (2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer of bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 85 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before the police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T