← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20852/2023allowed

Sunny @ Sukhvir Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-10Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20852 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2022 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sunny @ Sukhvir Singh Son of Gurucharan Singh Resident of - Ajeet Nagar, P.S.- Samana, Distt.- Patiyala, Punjab ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumit Shekhar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S. Kamal P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 414 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 36 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. As per allegation, from a truck, total 5117.76 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor were recovered and the driver and conducted of the alleged truck were arrested. The name of the petitioner got surfaced on the confession of arrested driver and conducted of the alleged truck.

2/4 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He also submits that the petitioner the petitioner was not arrested from the spot and his name got surfaced on the confession of arrested accused persons.

He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 03.11.2022.

It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that apart from the present one, the petitioner is also made accused in one other case, in which, he is on bail. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.

However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in

3/4 the sum of 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of ₹ the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-02, Begusarai, in connection with S. Kamal P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022, on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting

4/4 satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same. (v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(vi) In case, the petitioner repeats offence of similar nature after enlargement on bail, his bail-bond will be cancelled by the court below.

Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) Amrendra/- U T