Amit Patel v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19327 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2025 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Amit Patel S/o Rajvanshi Patel @ Rajvanshi Singh Resident of Village - Dewariya, P.S- Maharajganj, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 465 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111, 61(2), 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8/20 (b)(ii) B of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the police had an input that certain persons have gathered for committing some offence. Four persons were apprehended, and they disclosed the name of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19327 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026 2/2 submits that the petitioner was not apprehended. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. He has been framed in this case only on the basis of his criminal antecedents. Petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that a supplementary affidavit has been filed, which goes to show that the petitioner has suffered a fracture in his leg and is unable to move, with a rod having been surgically fixed in his leg.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 465 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Siwan subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T