Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58356/2017bail granted

Md. Aftab Ansari @ Aftab Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-08Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58356 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1857 Year-2014 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Banka ====================================================== Md. Aftab Ansari @ Aftab Ansari son of Azad Ansari Resident of Village - Dahua, Police Station - Bounshi, District - Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Bibi Aarifa Khatoon daughter of Md. Kalam Ansari Resident of Village - Dahua, Police Station - Bounshi, District - Banka. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. SURENDRA KUMAR, APP For O.P. No.2 :

Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Pandey, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 22.9.2017 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58356 of 2017(2) dt.08-12-2017 2/2 the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Banka in connection with Complaint case No.1857 of 2014. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T