← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49640/2017bail granted

Ghuran Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49640 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49640 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2015 Thana -JHANJHARPUR District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Ghuran Kamat Son of Prem Kamat, Resident of Village-Konar, P.S. Phulpras, District-Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jhanjharpur P.S.Case No.14 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpired during the course of investigation of the case. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement, there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner. There is no recovery and he is in custody for about four months. The petitioner is accused in one more case but he is on bail in that case.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49640 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Jhanjharpur P.S.Case No.14 of 2015 dated 13.01.2015.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T