Tuntun Rishi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14865 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2019 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Tuntun Rishi Son of Arjun Rishi Resident of Abdulla Nagar, Nageshwar Bagh, P.S.- Sadar, District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 05-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State, through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Special Case No. 31 of 2019 (arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 566 of 2019) registered under sections 8, 21, 22(b) of the NDPS Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, the car in which the petitioner was travelling along with other accused persons, was stopped and on search 13.70 gm of smack was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation of recovery is false and concocted and he is in custody since 18.11.2019.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14865 of 2020(3) dt.05-06-2020 2/2 for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of recovery of 13.70 gm of smack from possession of the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his application for bail is rejected. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody. (Partha Sarthy, J) sushma/- U