Md. Shahjahan Alam And ANR v. The Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8870 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Shahjahan Alam s/o Ahmed Hussain, resident of village- Malingaon, P.S.- Powakhali District - Kishanganj, Ex. Zonal Waqf Officer, Zonal Waqf Office, Kishanganj.

2.

Md. Mazhar Alam, S/o Jamil Akhtar, Resident of Mirshikar Toli, P.S. Alamganj, District- Patna, Ex Survey Assistant, Zonal Waqf Office, Kishanganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board 2.

The Chairman, Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board through 34 Ali Imam Path Harding Road, Haj Bhawan, Patn 3.

The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board 34 Ali Imam Path Harding Road, Haj Bhaw 4.

The Director Ministry of Minority Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. 5.

Central Waqf Council Central Waqf Bhawan, P- 13/14 Sector-6, Pushpvihar, Opposite Family Court, New ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rashid Izhar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 17-06-2025 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners; however, learned counsel for the Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board is present.

2. On 06.05.2025 the following order has been passed :- "Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel for Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board is present.

2. As a matter of last indulgence, this case is adjourned.

3. Put up this case on 17.06.2025. If,

Patna High Court CWJC No.8870 of 2016(4) dt.17-06-2025 2/2 no one appears on behalf of the petitioners on the said date, then appropriate order shall be passed."

3. Today, despite repeated calls, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners. It appears to this Court that the petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing the present matter.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U