Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjit Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16717 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2024 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjit Sah, Son of Kameshwar Sah Village- Dharmpur Bande, P.S.- Patori, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jagjit Roshan, Adv, Mr. Anjani Kumar, Adv Mr. Prashant Raj, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-04-2025

1. Heard Mr. Jagjit Roshan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case No. 100 of 2024 dated 18.03.2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that the petitioner is cousin brother of the husband of the deceased and in the entire FIR, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and admittedly, the informant is not an eye-witness of the alleged occurrence and after the investigation, the police concluded that the deceased committed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16717 of 2025(2) dt.11-04-2025 2/2 suicide and the petitioner has been chargesheeted for the offence of abatement to suicide under Section 306 of the I.P.C. but regarding this allegation, there is no evidence against him moreover, he had no reason to abate or instigate the deceased to commit the suicide as he is not a close family member of the husband of the deceased. It is further submitted that against the petitioner, the investigation has been completed and he has been languishing in jail since 24.11.2024.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

5. Considering the aforesaid submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel and mainly taking into account the completion of investigation against the petitioner, this court is inclined to release him on regular bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail in connection with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case No. 100 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U T