← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37068/2018bail granted

Md. Sahjad @ Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2018-06-29Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37068 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2018 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Md. Sahjad @ Raj, son of Md. Hasib, Resident of Mohalla- Mohallaper, P.S. Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barbigha (Mission) O.P. P.S Case No. 133 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of POCSO Act. Allegedly, minor daughter of the informant was kidnapped by the petitioner. During investigation the statement of the victim girl has been rerecorded wherein she has not supported the allegation of kidnapping vide Annexure-2. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the statement of the victim girl, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37068 of 2018(2) dt.29-06-2018 2/2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura, in connection with Barbigha (Mission) O.P. P.S. Case No. 133 of 2018 (POCSO Case No. 17 of 2018), subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T